Welcome to 3AW. Skip directly to: Search Box, Section Navigation, Content.

3AW - Fairfax Radio Network

Monday March 22, 2010

What we're talking about

Derryn Hinch attacks Bill Henson

Posted by: Derryn Hinch, 3AW Drive | 6 October, 2008 - 4:19 PM
Artist Bill Henson - scouted for talent at a primary school

This is so crazy. This is so bizarre. This is so disgusting. And this is so wrong I hardly know where to start.

A man who photographs naked children for a living in the name of art is given permission by a primary school principal to wander around the school yard, incognito, to pick out possible models for his camera.

What was the headmaster Sue Knight thinking? What was artist Bill Henson thinking as he prowled the grounds of the St Kilda Primary School. 'There's a pretty nine-year-old girl. She'd look good naked. There's an innocent looking ten-year-old boy. I could imagine him backlit with no clothes on.'

Any other man, with or without a camera, could be arrested for loitering with intent.

To me this is madness. In Henson's own words, to author David Marr: "I went in there -just wandered around while everyone was having their lunch. I saw this boy, and I saw a girl too, actually, and I thought they would be great. And the principal said 'fine, I will give the parents a ring and let you know'."

The parents hadn't been told that an artist who specialised in photos of naked children was conducting a sort of pre-pubescent, mini-meat market in their school grounds.

And this is at a time when parents are being stopped  for even trying to take innocent pictures of their own kids at swimming carnivals.

Don't let the artsy-fartsy world con you on this one. And make you feel like Philistines or prudes.

There are several big issues at stake. One is the sdafety and the sanctity of the schoolyard. You should be confident that when you send your children off to school they will be protected. It is for good reason that adults cannot wander around schools at will. In this case, for some bizarre reason, Henson had the principal's permission.

The other issue is the exploitation of children. The last Henson controversy was earlier this year. A  black and white photo of a 12-year-old girl - naked with growing breasts and hands casually folded over her crotch - was featured on the invitation to a Sydney art gallery event.

As I said then: Some will say it is art. That it is professional expression.Some will protest that the body is beautiful. To display it is natural. But it is also a lucrative business for both the gallery and the cameraman.

I won't argue if an adult woman wants to pose for Playboy or make porno movies.

But this girl, and the boy from St. Kilda were not old enough to understand the full ramifications of what they were unleashing. And to the sicko, psycho, raincoat brigade their innocence and naiveté that makes it even more appealing. What the hell have we come to?

Blog comments Your Say

  • Anna you are very naive. 'Normal' people would probably find no offence in such innocence however paedophiles use these images to perpetuate their behaviour. Alarminlgy, if society accepts this 'art', then this allows offenders to normalise and justify their behaviour. This is very dangerous.

    Car Tuesday 2 December, 2008 - 1:37 PM

  • I agree Derryn child exploitation, of any kind, is revolting enough witout it occurring using our schools as a meatmakets.
    i was asked if a child of mine could be used as a poster boy for breast feeding babies, how could i possibly allow such given that it would be 21 years before he could possibly make an informed decision himself in the matter?
    The parents that allow such exploitation of their children certainly are not responsible parents in my opinion.

    Jason Thursday 20 November, 2008 - 5:01 PM

  • bill henson's photographs should not be considered naked at all.

    merilyn Sunday 2 November, 2008 - 7:53 PM

  • i think this guy has no idea on what he is talking about bill henson is a good man he has done alot of good things. he has done alot in his life he knows wat he is looking for. He is not a pedophile so what is evry one goin on about

    lillkid Tuesday 21 October, 2008 - 10:22 AM

  • henson is a creep to do this to a kid,
    if he was so interested in the human body why dosent he take photos of a older person or a person that can understand the

    don key Tuesday 21 October, 2008 - 10:22 AM

  • good on you mr hinch..
    ITS TRUE! he is a sick twisted man if he wants to go into a school and pick out the "beautiful" kids..
    cause that is what they are KIDS! i am 16 years old and when i saw them pictures i felt sick! and what was that princibel thinking?? its rong on every leaval you are ment to be a school to feel safe! and the children wernt safe that day! its rong why is this stoping any old man with a camera walking into a school saying he wants models.. it is just giving people more reasons to get away with things..

    hollie henderson Tuesday 21 October, 2008 - 10:17 AM

Post a comment * Mandatory fields