Recent entries
- 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis movie'
- 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch'
- Society's ignorance towards child porn
- 'A Judicial Joke'
- 'Verbal sewer' harming our children?
- 'That Tammy-Lee sure gets around'
- Heartbreaking plea to stay with Mum
- Derryn wants your help
- RSS Syndicate this blog (XML)
What we're talking about
- Mat on 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis ... Shows what sort of society we've become when people want someone dead just so they're no longer inconvenienced. more
- Cheryl on 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis ... Doesn't he know we lose interest in news stories quickly these days, shoot him and get to another story, lol more
- M. on 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis ... A lethal weapon reference Derryn? Getting too old for this s--t. more
- Al Capone on 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis ... First of all the person who provided comment on this issue under the name of Al Capone presented through the Sly Fact File ... more
- Mylene on 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis ... What would Mick Miller have done? :p more
- Put This Baddy in the Binse on 'They'd never be in a Bruce Willis ... This is beyond a joke, people want to get home to their places, this nasty man is delaying people's lives.The police should ... more
- garry on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' i dont care to much for craig thomson but as long as he is there, workchoices is not and thats a great thing. more
- Mylene on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Hinch is just mad that Craig Thomson quoted To Kill a Mockingbird instead of Death in Newport or The Ultimate Guide to ... more
- The Anti Corruption Barbeque on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Every Australian citizen is currently very concerned with the direction our nation has taken over the last decade and the ... more
- Janesse Hurd on Heartbreaking plea to stay with Mum Please lend your Voice and Support to the Four Queensland Sisters......"Kids Without Voices".... for the Benefit and Safety ... more
- Steve on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Jason think you'll find he has already been judged by an independant body put in place by his boss. Or are Work Fair ... more
- Geoff Mathers on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Wonder who paid for Thompson's legal script writers?Would have cost plenty. If he's no longer a member of the Labour Party, ... more
- jason on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Stop trying a man before he's even gone through the legal process. You're acting like a loose lynch-mob, and degrading ... more
- Al Capone on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' I sincerely hope both of the major parties realise what is at stake here. Both parties are currently teetering on the ... more
- Steve on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' If he knew he was being set up why sign off the expenses? I only had taxi driver put through a trip I did not take and I ... more
- Skeptic on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Thomson looked more rehearsed than a Kabuki actor... more
- Senga on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' YOU got Addicted to Corruption, Craig Thomson.Because the system in the goverment is so easy to rort there aren't very many ... more
- Kate on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' Any non profit organisation like a union would still be accountable to it's members. Credit Card Statements are issued ... more
- Jonathon L Benson on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' I trust the Victoria Police and poor ole NSW ones too and the Taxation Department will pursue this joker and put him before ... more
- mark on 'Craig, you’re no Atticus Finch' craig is a federal politition ,we have to believe him more
'Just get here' asylum seekers
Let's take Prime Minister Gillard at her word over the boat people. Feel free to say what you feel. It doesn’t make you a racist.
I said yesterday that the PM’s comments in queue-jumpers sounded like she had morphed into John Howard or Tony Abbott with a whiff of Pauline Hanson. And within hours of her prime ministerial edict that people should be released from the restraints of political correctness that other redhead hit the airwaves around the country.
Pauline Hanson says she is in ‘total agreement’ with the PM (I thought she would have said ‘agreeance’).‘That’s what I said in the parliament in 1986 and that’s what I’m saying now. It’s only when you have a true debate and let the people of Australia have a say that we can start to make the right decisions.’
Who would have thought Julia Gillard would be giving oxygen to Hanson. Especially when she savaged her in her own maiden speech in 1998.
Back then Julia Gillard said : ‘What the last red-headed woman who made a first speech in this place will never understand is that the vast majority of migrants come here determined to make a better life for themselves and their kids, and they are prepared to work unbelievably hard to achieve that dream.’
That sentiment doesn’t sit well with the new ‘turn them back’ toughness with a federal election looming.
Today the PM made a strong speech on boat people. She vowed there would be no return to Howard’s Pacific Solution. But then said she was working on a plan to have a refugee centre – a holding cell – on East Timor. So I guess Nauru was bad. East Timor is good. Go figure.
There’s a good example today why people are upset with Rudd-Gillard Government policy – as the boats keep coming.
The Herald Sun has the sympathetic story of one Adnan al Ghazal who fled Iraq in 1999 with his wife and baby. In 12 months they passed through country after country: Jordan, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, China and Hong Kong before reaching Melbourne to seek asylum. In his own words ‘a journey of seven countries where I was holding an illegal document and very limited money’.
Now, people like Julian Burnside and Government minister Craig Emerson would take umbrage if you called al Ghazal ‘an illegal migrant’. But he was. He became an illegal queue jumper when he passed through country after country to get here. Because Australia is the soft target ... the preferred destination.
That’s what the people smugglers hold out as a carrot. And remember, last year boat people paid smugglers $25 million to get here. They didn’t pay all that money to get to Cambodia or India or Indonesia.
Footnote:
Much will be made in the debate ahead of the Immigration Minister being able to step in and order the deportation of illegals. Sounds good on paper. Won’t happen. Not while the ATT is around. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Listen to the case of 55-year-old Sadik Selimi – an illiterate farmer from Macedonia. He came here in 1994. Got sprung after paying an Australian woman $25,000 for a sham marriage. He was convicted of 10 offences in 2000. Was refused a protection visa in 2001 and returned to Macedonia. Somehow he got back here but was again rejected in 2007.
Immigration was about to deport him but the ATT has ordered the Minister, Chris Evans, to issue him a visa even though he had engaged in ‘illegal and morally reprehensible conduct’ over a number of years.
The tribunal ruled the offences were not serious enough to warrant a rejection.
See just get here. That’s what the people smugglers tell them. Just get here. They’ll never send you back. Possession is nine tenths of the law.
PM looks to East Timor for solution
Latika Bourke and Neil Mitchell discuss the asylum seeker policies of both the government and opposition. Neil says Gillard's plan is 'shonky' and needs far more analysis. Leave your feedback in the blog.
Blog comments
-
Migrants to have a better life here,most definitely.Illegal immigrants,a definite "no".
John Langborne Thursday 22 July, 2010 - 10:15 AM -
The colour of her policy is like the actual colour of her hair. Trust me. Unreal and changes everyday. What u see is not what u see. There are more greys and reds and stuff in there. That's why she adopted an in house hairdresser. So don't expect too much. Hairs talk.
BurnleyT Saturday 10 July, 2010 - 12:27 PM -
GUsmao says he is sympathetic to the plite of asylum stuff but the financial debate has to be started first. That's Timorese and he is Pathetic.
Hinley Saturday 10 July, 2010 - 11:58 AM -
The rights of desperate asylum seekers have been thrown overboard. We do not need to be protected from asylum seekers: they need to be protected from their persecutors. What ever happened to human compassion?
Anthony B Friday 9 July, 2010 - 12:24 PM -
Sounds like another half thought up plan that will cost us millions and be a disaster!?
Ships ahoy Thursday 8 July, 2010 - 9:47 AM -
Boat people!Read "The Camp of Saints" by Jean Raspail(1975).The story:One million Indians invade supertanker and head for France
Tom Wednesday 7 July, 2010 - 4:08 PM






