- Parliament in lockdown as hunt continues
- Three dead in fatal 'neighbourhood dispute'
- 'Violence, unsafe sex and drugs'
- Why Rosie Batty erupted
- Blockbuster Easter to kickstart 2015
- Crews mop up Docklands diesel leak
- Truck smoulders on EastLink
- Gough Whitlam dead at 98
- RSS Syndicate this blog (XML)
What we're talking about
- Heather on Why Rosie Batty erupted I feel for Rosie Batty ' s loss of her son Luke. It seems the Andersons actions are attributed to MI when it should be ... more
- Factsseeker on Why Rosie Batty erupted What is the matter with our conservative media. There was a child killed here ! The coronial inquiry is being held to try ... more
- Damo on Why Rosie Batty erupted I know i will cop it for saying this but my understanding of this is: Rosie got a intervention order against her husband. ... more
- IBARKER on Why Rosie Batty erupted This one reason why she should not enter Politics. more
- Linda on Why Rosie Batty erupted This is a most distressing case, but we cannot allow ourselves to get to a point where people are above being questioned. ... more
- Tess on Why Rosie Batty erupted Two parents both love the children equally it's not one parents right to say they love(d) their child more than the other! ... more
- Mandi on Gough Whitlam dead at 98 These shall not be forgotten years.I will never forget that powerful speech an aussie icon laid to rest. more
- Gloss on Gough Whitlam dead at 98 Al Black, I agree. Whitlam was arrogant and self-centred and deserved to be sacked over the Khemlani Affair, which he ... more
- Iain on Gough Whitlam dead at 98 Yes Gough was a significant figure in Australian history but more, much more, than that..he was a decent and generous man. A ... more
- shane on Gough Whitlam dead at 98 Gough Whitlam was one of the greatest Labor Primeministers of all time, Gough could see 20 in front of him, his most ... more
- Al Black on Gough Whitlam dead at 98 Gough Whitlam's government was so bad it had to be sacked, and his legacy was to inspire Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard to ... more
- Phil on Teachers, students to protest together Its amazing the schools are encouraging their students to protest against 'children in the detention' but can't offer a ... more
- Bernadette on Teachers, students to protest together Catholic Teachings regarding Social Justice are very clearly set out, that ALL people regardless of who they are should at ... more
- Parent on Teachers, students to protest together A fantastic opportunity for young men to analyse & discuss the abhorrent detention of children who have a strong likelihood ... more
- Jack on Teachers, students to protest together I'm a student at st Bernard's college. Yesterday as protest was one that was derived from our colleges faith as Christians, ... more
- Turn it up on Teachers, students to protest together To everyone here commenting that this is disgusting and wrong and the students did not have a decision in the matter, Turn ... more
- Lina johns on Teachers, students to protest together Nice to see that we have young people in our community who have a heart and truly believe in humanity (children should not ... more
- Michael on Teachers, students to protest together I was a student at St Bernards.I couldn't be more proud. Well done boys and well done Tony. All you people having a whinge ... more
- Pedro on Teachers, students to protest together As a parent of a former 2014 St Bernard's College student, I congratulate Mr Paatsch on taking this leadership for the young ... more
- Sue on Teachers, students to protest together Disgusting that school teachers are allowed to infect our children with their views. more
Neil Mitchell’s clash with a 'silly, silly cyclist'
NEIL MITCHELL: For a moment yesterday I could sympathise with Shane Warne and Rex Hunt.
They both had nasty and silly road rage incidents with cyclists and I came across what I believe was my own fully-fledged idiot.
I was turning left off Collins Street, out of the Docklands, waiting for pedestrians and as I started to move off suddenly a cyclist came along on my inside and passed me, turning left on the inside.
I saw him at the last minute, swerved a little and on he went.
As I went past I gave him the sign of a few centimetres, that’s how close it was, just a 'That was close mate'.
I stopped at the next lights and he caught up. He belted on my window of the car. I wound it down. He started going on.
I told him he had passed on the inside, which was stupid and dangerous.
He obviously recognised me because I don’t know him, He called me Neil.
'That’ll teach you to look out for cyclists' he said and off he rode.
Well mate... if I hadn’t been alert you would have been on the ground. And if you keep passing people on the inside like that, close to the back of the car, you WILL end up on the ground.
It is also not a good idea to pull up to anybody at the lights and start belting on the car window. That can bring any sort of reaction.
What he did was smart, arrogant and wrong.
He was very proud of himself as he rode off down the road. He had made a point to me but he risked serious injury doing it.
And he broke the law. He is an idiot.
Bicycle riders are legally entitled to overtake other slower moving or stationary motor vehicles on their left.
The onus is on the left turning vehicle driver to ensure that it is safe to do so, and ensure that other road users are not impeded or put in danger.
Vehicles are of course fitted with mirrors for this purpose.
It would appear that Neil Mitchell did not check to see if it was safe to turn left without putting the cyclist in danger. It happens all the time.
Cyclists are classed as vehicles, legitimate road users, and motorists are required to share the road with them.
Mr Mitchell would do well to distance himself from his quoted hotheads Hunt and Warne.David Lewis Monday 7 January, 2013 - 6:38 PM
Thank you Al, I believe you are quite passionate about your hobby/necessity/need, and believe what you are posting. Sorry, but my posts have been based on both the point of this column, and my experience with other posters that are similar: Coming up on the left of a left turning vehicle; Yes, I've seen it. Running red lights; Yes, I've seen it. Lack of common sense on the road; yes, I've seen it. My main concern is that many bicycle riders regard themselves as being inviolate and without fault. Sorry, it doesn't work.David T. Wednesday 19 December, 2012 - 6:52 PM
@Gulia Jillard; You make as much sense as your (almost) namesake. How could a driver give way to every single cyclist, when the movements of so many are erratic, random, illegal and nonsensical. All that drivers can do is obey the current rules, hope that bike riders will do the same and try to forecast the actions of those riders who may not. That is a part of "Road Sense" and should be what we all adhere to.David T. Tuesday 18 December, 2012 - 5:29 PM
How do you feel about the 1300 deaths caused by cars each year?
Is the outrage more than the 1 person killed by a bike rider since 2000. In the same period over 1,000 people have been killed by / in cars and over 100 cyclists in Victoria in the same period.
You also seem to show contempt and disrespect for bike riders without evening knowing them and then wonder why they behavior in the same manner to you. In order to earn respect one must first give it.Stevie Tuesday 18 December, 2012 - 2:21 PM
I am not been defensive about bike behaviour, I am being honest. Are there some bike riders that break the law, Yes. Are bike rider unique in breaking the law. NO. You expect that bike riders should adhere to the letter of the law and in this case even when your interurptation of the law is wrong you stick by it. You are the one in the Kangaroo Court.
Both of you need to get a grip and look at the facts and anser one question.
Do some bike riders behave like some car drivers in that they pick and choose when they adhere to the law. The answer is yes, but for some reason you single out bike riders yet ignore the group that kills 1200 noationally each year whislt tlaking about the 1 cycling caused death in the past 12 years. A tab hypocritical and unbalcnaced.
And Jan you now comment on social behaviour of being rude, selfish arrogant etc and pretend that these are unique to bike riders. Do some have this attitude? No doubt but this would simply mirror society and certainly can be attrubuted to cars drivers aswell but you pretned tht this is not true. Like any group they will be a subset of society yet you ignore this and continue with your rubbish.
Bike riders are people too.
Time to show some empathy instead of hate.Al Tuesday 18 December, 2012 - 2:17 PM
@Jan; Don't pay any attention to Al's posts. They carry as much validity as those of a "Bush Lawyer" in a "Kangaroo Court". As I suggested in an earlier post; some bike riders, when being defensive about their actions, are very selective about the "rules" they quote and about the "facts" they state.David T. Tuesday 18 December, 2012 - 9:59 AM