- Hunger Games bad for your brain?
- New release movies, November 20
- Woman goes on 77 dates in 81 days
- Two dead in fiery Dromana smash
- The world's friendliest country
- Jim's movie cheat sheet, Nov 13
- New release movie reviews, Nov 14
- Finding Vivian Maier interview
- RSS Syndicate this blog (XML)
What we're talking about
- Patty Hanson on World's tallest cow over the mooon Thank you so much for interviewing me about Blosom! She is a special cow, and its nice to share her with others. She has the ... more
- judith on World's tallest cow over the mooon What a beautiful animal, do hope she lives to a ripe old age. more
- David Jackson on Family Feud error: Ride or Bride? Nah im hearing "ride" den! Good to see you keeping denya on his toes though! Hey our house stops like a melb cup race every ... more
- CHRIS WATTS on Cold enough for you? WELL IT IS WINTER AFTER ALL.....WHAT IS THE PROBLEM.... more
- Gazza on Meet Skippy, the white kangaroo I pass one most days south of the Mernda pub,big mobs there and whitey stands out like a beacon.. more
- Jo on Jim Keays dies, aged 67 R. I. P. Jim Keayes. Sympathy to his daughter, Russell Morris and many friends. more
- Gloria on Can Pat Panetta dance? Who cares if he is a good dancer or not, he certainly is a good looking bloke, lucky you Amanda. more
- Caroline on Can Pat Panetta dance? Kids will love it for a little while longer...thennnnnnn..........er....."God Dads embarrassing". more
- Maria on Can Pat Panetta dance? Sorry Pat....... The hands are a bit........ Girly more
- Frances Holmes on Can Pat Panetta dance? Amanda may hate the hands, but unfortunately Pat that's all you've got moving! more
- Pedrao on Can Pat Panetta dance? You dance like a typical white boy. As a youth, you'de have no chance on scoring. As an old man; who cares.Ã¯Â»Â¿ more
- Brad on Can Pat Panetta dance? He looks to enjoying himself and looks natural doing it, so who cares if its good or bad dancing. hahahaCheers Brad ... more
- anna on Can Pat Panetta dance? Pat, no you can't dance. We would like to here the music tho so we can see if your in beat more
- Jude on Can Pat Panetta dance? NO Pat - you cant dance - you dance like my husband!!!!:( :( :( more
- H on Dami Im joins Denis Walter Thanks for having Dami on your show. That was a very good interview, Good questions, Good answers. 3AW, please play her ... more
- kerrie on Denis Walter live from New York Hi Dennis went too new york may 2013 with husband had a great time there check out ellens star dust diner and visit the soup ... more
- Tim on Denis Walter live from New York No wonder that lady named Judy didn't recognise the song you sang to her! She may have if you used the correct words Denis! ... more
- Noel on Denis Walter live from New York Great listening to you in New York.I am reliving my visit and taking note of the sights you are seeing and I hope to see, ... more
- Roger on Denis Walter live from New York Dennis I rang you on live radio about the New York Yacht Club next door to the Sofitel but if you get down to Wall St ... more
- di padgett on Denis Walter live from New York go have a baileys milkshake at Bills Burgers Rockerfellar and do the underground tour of rockerfellar more
New release movie reviews - 27 December
LIFE OF PI ****1/2 (127 minutes) PG
Very rarely does a film come along that makes you strain for superlatives.
Ang Lee's extraordinary, lyrical, beautiful, moving, genre-defying Life of Pi can, nonetheless, be recommended with the simple, sweeping assurance that it is unlike anything you have ever seen before.
After the freighter carrying his family's zoo animals goes down in a storm, teenage Indian boy Pi (Suraj Sharma) finds himself on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. And it's not a conveniently anthropomorphised beast with human-like attributes. It's a wild critter that'd eat Pi if only its claws could reach the makeshift raft Pi has to inhabit while trying to work out how he's going to survive.
Yet part of the film's unique magic is how the reality of the relationship is set against an almost dream-like seascape of stunning skies, endless oceans and haunting creatures of the sea. This includes Pi's surreal encounter with a singuarly bizarre sea-dwelling organism clearly designed to test the limits of the average film goer's imagination.
It's a brave mainstream film that unashamedly announces itself as a spiritual adventure, one that "will make you believe in God", as the adult Pi (Irrfan Khan) casually declares to his inspiration-seeking blocked writer friend (Rafe Spall). It's this deceptively conventional yarn-spinning device that frames a fable-like tale that invites even the most cynical people - yes, that includes die-hard atheists - to engage with its ideas, metaphors and musings about The Almighty.
Destined to become a classic, Life of Pi is a film that becomes ever more engrossing, enchanting, enlightening and uplifting the more you think about it - a quality that runs so counter to so many mainstream films today.
Based on the 2001 novel by Yann Martel and written by David Magee, director Ang Lee (Brokeback Mountain; Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon; Sense and Sensibility; The Ice Storm) always keeps the film's grand flights grounded in Pi's central dilemma. It's easily the best film of Lee's long career and one that rewards repeat viewings.
And the film is a visual marvel. Lee's use of 3D is stunning, deployed less for the big, spectacular moments - which, let's face it, don't need 3D boosting if they're done right - and more to amplify Pi's inner journey. It's another example of 3D being used to enhance drama and emotion rather than scale and pyrotechnics.
As for the digital rendering of the tiger, the Academy Award people are going to have to invent a new category acknowledging the dramatic achievement now possible with visual effects.
It's a whole new realm of performance. The androids in Terminator 2 and I Robot, Gollum in Lord of the Rings, the apes in Rise of the Planet of the Apes, even the monkey in King Kong broke new ground in the dramatic subtleties now possible with digital visuals.
The tiger in Life of Pi deserves a special Oscar for making us care so deeply about a beast that would happily tear your throat out if it had the chance. That's just one of the achievements in this brilliant, one-of-a-kind film. (Opens New Year's Day)
JACK REACHER *** (130 minutes) M
As ex-army crime investigator Jack Reacher, Tom Cruise is a tightly wound ball of butt-kicking energy just itching to be unleashed if sufficiently provoked. With his utterances full of testosterone and his eyes gleaming with unmistakeable "you asked for it" confidence, Reacher presents himself after an Iraq war vet is accused of a shooting spree along a quiet river-side park in Pittsburgh. Hired by defense attorney Helen Rodin (a terrific performance by Rosamund Pike, the British actress from Made in Dagenham, An Education and Pride and Prejudice), Reacher knocks heads with detectives, lawyers and assorted bad guys as he sifts through the evidence to - guess what?! - discover that all is not as it seems.
Produced by Cruise as another franchise character, Jack Reacher is a standard, somewhat formulaic crime procedural sparked up by its cast: Cruise's hammy, smirk-ridden version of author Lee Child's Reacher is designed to keep his fan army happy; Robert Duvall is great as a crotchety gun expert; and Werner Herzog - one of the few living directors who can legitimately lay claim to being a genius - steals a fistful of scenes as the deep-thinking bad guy.
(Listen fast for his great line: "Always the bullet. I don't understand.") This is solid, enjoyable, formula-driven stuff designed to self-replicate into a film series, nothing more - and there's nothing wrong with that. As with most casting "controversies", the tiresome outrage over Cruise taking on the role - he's much shorter than the character from the novels, wailed the online moaners - came to nothing.
As usual. Author Lee Child has even gone on record saying how delighted he was to have the biggest movie star in the world playing Reacher. His website shows how delirious he is about the film. After all, if an author is really unhappy with what someone might do with their books, they can always keep the movie rights to themselves. (Opens New Year's Day)