- Jim’s cheat sheet, March 7
- Moomba royalty graces the airwaves!
- One woman’s frightening affair with pokies
- All Is Lost: Interview with director JC Chandor
- Handbag wonder from down under
- New release movie reviews – March 6
- Paula Abdul talks success with Denis Walter
- Winter Olympians gear up for Grand Prix
- RSS Syndicate this blog (XML)
What we're talking about
- Martin on Model sacked, told her bum's too big Ms Nicole is perfect, when will these designers realise men want meat not sticks. more
- Tracy Johnson on Austin Powers joins Friday Lunch Mark Andrew is one of a kind.With all is characters is best known for Elvis,in my views he is the best. more
- ian on Austin Powers joins Friday Lunch I had seen Mark on several occasions and to tell you he is great more
- Robert Rich on Back to the future for Moomba This is a joke !!!!!!! more
- Heather on Back to the future for Moomba Oh so wrong!!! Am sick of Bert being treated like a demi god. He's had his turn and would have thought he would do decent ... more
- CHRIS WATTS on Back to the future for Moomba once was enough,BUT not twice....why do we need to pamper this old tv worker.......Abbott is going back to the Howard days, ... more
- Jane on Back to the future for Moomba Oh spare me. Newton again. "Clown" hall does it again. How about honouring the CFA instead or someone like Moira Kelly for ... more
- ian on Back to the future for Moomba This would have the worst decision since the people voted Gillard in a P/M. more
- Jill on Back to the future for Moomba I would rather applaud our CFA during the Moomba Parade, than Bert Newton. Maybe we can applaud Bert Newton come Logie time. more
- Christine on Back to the future for Moomba You've got to be kidding ! more
- Alison Horner on Around the home with Shannon Lush Hi Shannon could you please advise washing microfibre cleaning cloths indicate no softness or bleach products to be used. ... more
- Craig on Chuck Berry takes a dive Ummmm.. Looks like he had a parachute on too... Nothing to see here. more
- ian on Mum furious: A stranger smacked my child Any witnesses. more
- Grant O'Connor on Mum furious: A stranger smacked my child Do you seriously need to ask that question?What do you think Dennis? Anyone who slaps a strangers child deserves to slapped ... more
- David on Have young people lost their manners? Yes.. Especially younger women. If you open a door for them or give them a compliment these days they automatically assume ... more
- Gloss on Weatherman's approaching low front Bloody Beautiful, should be more of it. more
- Garry on Have young people lost their manners? People are not only losing their manners,with the libs in government their also losing their jobs,wages and conditions...... more
- biggles on Aussies worried about their ... if you took Alcohol out of Australia ,,it would collapse more
- Aria Judilla on Weatherman's approaching low front Great work Cameron. The "journalist" is standing in a public area and he physically attacks somebody just for standing next ... more
- Steve on Weatherman's approaching low front I remember that one with Cameron and the idiot didn't come back for another one either >. more
New release movie reviews - 27 December
LIFE OF PI ****1/2 (127 minutes) PG
Very rarely does a film come along that makes you strain for superlatives.
Ang Lee's extraordinary, lyrical, beautiful, moving, genre-defying Life of Pi can, nonetheless, be recommended with the simple, sweeping assurance that it is unlike anything you have ever seen before.
After the freighter carrying his family's zoo animals goes down in a storm, teenage Indian boy Pi (Suraj Sharma) finds himself on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. And it's not a conveniently anthropomorphised beast with human-like attributes. It's a wild critter that'd eat Pi if only its claws could reach the makeshift raft Pi has to inhabit while trying to work out how he's going to survive.
Yet part of the film's unique magic is how the reality of the relationship is set against an almost dream-like seascape of stunning skies, endless oceans and haunting creatures of the sea. This includes Pi's surreal encounter with a singuarly bizarre sea-dwelling organism clearly designed to test the limits of the average film goer's imagination.
It's a brave mainstream film that unashamedly announces itself as a spiritual adventure, one that "will make you believe in God", as the adult Pi (Irrfan Khan) casually declares to his inspiration-seeking blocked writer friend (Rafe Spall). It's this deceptively conventional yarn-spinning device that frames a fable-like tale that invites even the most cynical people - yes, that includes die-hard atheists - to engage with its ideas, metaphors and musings about The Almighty.
Destined to become a classic, Life of Pi is a film that becomes ever more engrossing, enchanting, enlightening and uplifting the more you think about it - a quality that runs so counter to so many mainstream films today.
Based on the 2001 novel by Yann Martel and written by David Magee, director Ang Lee (Brokeback Mountain; Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon; Sense and Sensibility; The Ice Storm) always keeps the film's grand flights grounded in Pi's central dilemma. It's easily the best film of Lee's long career and one that rewards repeat viewings.
And the film is a visual marvel. Lee's use of 3D is stunning, deployed less for the big, spectacular moments - which, let's face it, don't need 3D boosting if they're done right - and more to amplify Pi's inner journey. It's another example of 3D being used to enhance drama and emotion rather than scale and pyrotechnics.
As for the digital rendering of the tiger, the Academy Award people are going to have to invent a new category acknowledging the dramatic achievement now possible with visual effects.
It's a whole new realm of performance. The androids in Terminator 2 and I Robot, Gollum in Lord of the Rings, the apes in Rise of the Planet of the Apes, even the monkey in King Kong broke new ground in the dramatic subtleties now possible with digital visuals.
The tiger in Life of Pi deserves a special Oscar for making us care so deeply about a beast that would happily tear your throat out if it had the chance. That's just one of the achievements in this brilliant, one-of-a-kind film. (Opens New Year's Day)
JACK REACHER *** (130 minutes) M
As ex-army crime investigator Jack Reacher, Tom Cruise is a tightly wound ball of butt-kicking energy just itching to be unleashed if sufficiently provoked. With his utterances full of testosterone and his eyes gleaming with unmistakeable "you asked for it" confidence, Reacher presents himself after an Iraq war vet is accused of a shooting spree along a quiet river-side park in Pittsburgh. Hired by defense attorney Helen Rodin (a terrific performance by Rosamund Pike, the British actress from Made in Dagenham, An Education and Pride and Prejudice), Reacher knocks heads with detectives, lawyers and assorted bad guys as he sifts through the evidence to - guess what?! - discover that all is not as it seems.
Produced by Cruise as another franchise character, Jack Reacher is a standard, somewhat formulaic crime procedural sparked up by its cast: Cruise's hammy, smirk-ridden version of author Lee Child's Reacher is designed to keep his fan army happy; Robert Duvall is great as a crotchety gun expert; and Werner Herzog - one of the few living directors who can legitimately lay claim to being a genius - steals a fistful of scenes as the deep-thinking bad guy.
(Listen fast for his great line: "Always the bullet. I don't understand.") This is solid, enjoyable, formula-driven stuff designed to self-replicate into a film series, nothing more - and there's nothing wrong with that. As with most casting "controversies", the tiresome outrage over Cruise taking on the role - he's much shorter than the character from the novels, wailed the online moaners - came to nothing.
As usual. Author Lee Child has even gone on record saying how delighted he was to have the biggest movie star in the world playing Reacher. His website shows how delirious he is about the film. After all, if an author is really unhappy with what someone might do with their books, they can always keep the movie rights to themselves. (Opens New Year's Day)