3AW - Fairfax Radio Network

What we're talking about

  • Solomons' Sword on 'I don't deserve this' Paramedic standing over a sick patient: "Who are you going to vote for" before deciding what treatment to administer...Some ... more
  • Deffa on 'I don't deserve this' @ David, It is not the same deal. The potential labour offer is 12% over 2 years, Governmet offer is 12% over 3 yrs. There ... more
  • Janelle on Photo: Cane toad in Melbourne? Looks like a 'Banjo Frog' to me. Found one in Greensborough. more
  • Sam Maglitto on 'I don't deserve this' Over this Union lead Dispute, yes I think Ambos and Paramedics deserve a better deal, But using the Vehicles and their ... more
  • Heather on 'I don't deserve this' Unbelievable!!! This story has just decided my vote! Thank you Louise for your service (ditto to all other paramedics) and ... more
  • Anna Brown on 'I don't deserve this' Louise is an incredibly hard working & dedicated paramedic. Paramedics work long hours in what r often traumatic & ... more
  • IBARKER on 'I don't deserve this' Wear the uniform ?? but not your political "VIEWS""" more
  • Marsha on Photo: Cane toad in Melbourne? I had a look at some photos as I didn't think the feet looked like a cane toad. Thanks for the Pobblebonk name - feet are ... more
  • Lukew on 'I don't deserve this' The ambulance service should not be political and I think the disciplinary action for using the uniform to promote a ... more
  • David on 'I don't deserve this' They were offered the same deal they said Labor offered and they would accept.. This is another example of Union thugs ... more
  • Peggy on 'I don't deserve this' If she wants to make it personal then she should protest. Even if in uniform she can protest but to represent her employer ... more
  • The quiet 'medic on 'I don't deserve this' Not mentioned here is that wearing our uniform for union actions outside of work is covered under protected industrial ... more
  • Mark Cornford on 'I don't deserve this' It's getting to the stage that the Ambo's will soon ask if you are Liberal or Labour and if you are not what they support ... more
  • Kylie on 'I don't deserve this' This gives one some insight into the bullying culture ambos cop under Ambulance Victoria. They treat ambos like utter ... more
  • Kris on 'I don't deserve this' Yeah it seems pathetic but if it is policy you knew about it and you broke the rules then you should get punished for it. more
  • Angry Ambo on 'I don't deserve this' This is yet another example of Ambulance Victoria's adversarial management approach toward their employees. They ... more
  • Luke on Photo: Cane toad in Melbourne? Just to add, there are quite a few variations of Pobblebonk frog, also known as an Eastern Banjo - ... more
  • Luke on Photo: Cane toad in Melbourne? Its a native frog called a Pobblebonk! Got to be careful not misidentifying animals. more
  • Tracy Anderson on Photo: Cane toad in Melbourne? You were right the first time That slimy pestle beast dose look like Clive Palmer but then again if it really was him he ... more
  • Scott on Photo: Cane toad in Melbourne? 100% not a cane toad, it's a common froglet. more

Royal prank tragedy: "The buck stops with the boss"

Posted by: Neil Mitchell | 10 December, 2012 - 8:32 AM
2day FM Logo

NEIL MITCHELL: First this outrage around 2Day FM. The prank call to the hospital and the suicide of the nurse caught in it.

This is so sad for everybody but particularly the woman’s family.

But…. Let’s get this straight. What happened would not happen in talk radio.

It would not happen here, at the ABC, Alan Jones wouldn’t do it.

LISTEN BELOW: CEO of Southern Cross Austereo Rhys Holleran speaks with Neil Mitchell.

The problem here is that FM is effectively covered by different rules and operates in a different world. Or at least some of it does.

I have legal advice, open to argument I am sure, that 2-Day fm did not breach any radio guidelines. Certainly they believe that.

The codes of conduct are unequivocal on talk radio.

Code 6.1 says you cannot broadcast material unless the person recorded knows about it.

You can’t put somebody to air unless they know they are on air.

That is under the headline ‘Interviews and talkback programs’. So is a prank call an interview?

It certainly wasn’t a talk back program.

They are covered by the light entertainment section, Code 9, and you could drive a truck through that.

So they may be OK under radio law however I think they have problems under surveillance and recording devices law.

Which says you can record another person when you are part of their conversation but not replay it without approval from them.

But look there is a broader point here. These two presenters. They should not wear it all.

The focus is all on the two DJ’s Mel Greig & Michael Christian.

That I suspect is wrong. Yes...they did do something stupid. But who takes responsibility?

Normal process is that these things are pre-recorded and replayed.

So who approved it going to air? These two are very junior presenters.

There is no way they would have made the decision to put it to air

Was it a senior producer? Was it a program director? Imagine if they pre-recorded this?

It was a world scoop – ‘the ultimate prank’. They would have been be so delighted. They would be running around telling everybody

So who knew? Who approved it? And why are these two wearing all the blame?

The buck stops with the boss.

LISTEN: CEO of Southern Cross Austereo Rhys Holleran speaks with Neil Mitchell

Having problems listening? Upgrade your media player for Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Firefox.

(Click here to listen to the audio in a pop-up window)

Share

3AW Mornings with Neil Mitchell

Neil Mitchell Neil is one of Australia’s most experienced journalists with success in newspapers, radio and television. He was one of the youngest editors of a daily metropolitan newspaper, The Herald.

 

Blog comments Your Say

  • It was never funny, it was plain disrespectful to invade the royals privacy. It should never have gone to air without the permission of those involved. There should have been more 'royal security' to screen any calls. A lot of people are to blame here. Finally public pranks should never be allowed on innocent unsuspecting people, worse still someone you dont even know.

    margy Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 1:55 PM
  • I keep hearing Rhys Holleran claim that 2DayFM tried to call the Hospital five times prior to the 'prank' being aired! Am I such a sceptic? Do I believe this? Can these 'attempts' be proved? Time for Telsta or whoever to come out and prove this statement. Freedom Of Information? Somehow we must be able to validate Mr Hollaran's claim! ...Can we believe this radio CEO? Can I ask for confirmation of these attempts, please Mr Holloran...knowing how you have in the past claimed to be a bit baffled by community standards of 'decency' I am not sure that you and I have the same 'code of ethics' when it comes to telling the truth! Evidence of your attempts to contact, please Sir. As well, "trying' to get through (however many times!) does not constitute "getting through and receiving permission". Keep spinning, Rhys..we are not fooled!

    Roz2911 Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 12:27 PM
  • Rhys Holleran has been making excuses, avoiding truths, refusing to change the culture at 2day for far too long. This guy needs to go and the other management - has anyone asked Derek Bargwanna if he was involved - need to step up. I feel for these two presenters, they did what was expected of them, they worked in an environment that endorses exploitation, humiliation, bullying and so on.

    Rhys Holleran needs to man up and take it on the chin - he needs to go! And the other management involved need to be outed for their role. Spotlight should be on management who surely did not follow 'those processes.

    To say that this was unforseable is hardly accurate. You play with fire and eventually you or someone you are dealing with is going to get burnt.

    Kate Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 10:12 AM
  • CEO and the two morons should be fired and everyone ought to boycott the station AND any and all companies that advertise on it until that happens.

    Robert Carreira Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 4:12 AM
  • Its so obvious that Mr Holleran has been speaking to his lawyers. Everything he said on radio has loaded with legal-speak "nobody could have foreseen the circumstances", "couldn't reasonably think it foreseeable". Tally the number of times he uses the words "reasonably foreseeable". Mr Holleran is more concerned about legal liability than anything else. puke!

    law guy Monday 10 December, 2012 - 10:48 PM
  • Absolutely agree the fault lies with the station bosses who OKd this and the hospital for not having any protocols in place to deal with calls re Kates' condition and care. Or even the royals themselves for not having a PR person to deal with these sort of calls, no matter who they claimed to be.

    GIW Monday 10 December, 2012 - 7:49 PM

Post a comment * Mandatory fields