3AW - Fairfax Radio Network

What we're talking about

  • David THomas on 'The figures say it all' Statistical evidence mounts that the police often do not recruit the sharpest pencils in the box. Seriously. Turn the ... more
  • John on 'The figures say it all' This is not about fairness, it is about deflecting responsibility. The camera system should conform to vehicles operating ... more
  • Paul on 'The figures say it all' Have a look at the front of any modern bike and you will quickly see why it is not possible to put a front plate on. There ... more
  • CHRIS WATTS on 'The figures say it all' i just cannot believe that a simple e tag cannot be stuck on the front of the bike...its so simple, surely... more
  • Samuel J on 'The figures say it all' Motor cycles should have front and rear number plates. The notion that front number plates dissect pedestrians is complete ... more
  • Mark on 'The figures say it all' All a bit of a joke, here in Europe, bikes get a much larger rear plate... more than double the size. Aussies often hide the ... more
  • Richard on 'The figures say it all' If its such a problem why are the Penisula Link cameras facing the front? The fault is in the camera system. more
  • Tom Bysen on 'The figures say it all' Why not ban bikes altogether? We can all sit jammed on the freeway, in our 2tonne suv's being safe. more
  • John Karmouche on 'The figures say it all' Everyone is barking up the wrong tree. Its not about putting a number plate on a motorcycle- that's the cover story the ... more
  • Lukew on 'The figures say it all' Commissioner Gordon Lewis can huff and puff all he likes but this is about the money. Never mind the doubt, why would we ... more
  • poppitt on 'The figures say it all' Against the law to ride a bike that does have number plates back and front. Fine them $500 for each plate that is not ... more
  • Time for a career change Neil on 'The figures say it all' Gee, it must be almost the 3rd week of the month. Time for Neil to roll out the anti motorcycle vitriol again. The same ... more
  • Otto on 'The figures say it all' Anything to justify the cash cows, how many of these thousands of lethal speeding motorcycles actually result in a fatality ... more
  • Gazza on Top cop concerned over pokies gang Multiculturalism at its finest more
  • dom on Spot the 'ghost'? Sorry the line for popcorn was long... more
  • Rory on Spot the 'ghost'? Why do ghosts always have clothes on? I wonder if a tradie has to wear Hi-Viz if they get a ghost. more
  • charles on Spot the 'ghost'? I see an elderly lady old white shirt, black hair, pale skin sitting at the top of staircase, peering to the right as if ... more
  • Rhees on Spot the 'ghost'? I can see through the railings.Enlarge picture and take a close look, definitely something there.One place i worked at ... more
  • Anne of Dallas on Spot the 'ghost'? Well.. I cant see the ghost.. but I did learn something fabulous from one of the readers in comment! "Enlarge for a better ... more
  • Joanne on Spot the 'ghost'? Enlarge for a better look. To enlarge the photo if using a computer: press control and the plus button at the same time more

Royal prank tragedy: "The buck stops with the boss"

Posted by: Neil Mitchell | 10 December, 2012 - 8:32 AM
2day FM Logo

NEIL MITCHELL: First this outrage around 2Day FM. The prank call to the hospital and the suicide of the nurse caught in it.

This is so sad for everybody but particularly the woman’s family.

But…. Let’s get this straight. What happened would not happen in talk radio.

It would not happen here, at the ABC, Alan Jones wouldn’t do it.

LISTEN BELOW: CEO of Southern Cross Austereo Rhys Holleran speaks with Neil Mitchell.

The problem here is that FM is effectively covered by different rules and operates in a different world. Or at least some of it does.

I have legal advice, open to argument I am sure, that 2-Day fm did not breach any radio guidelines. Certainly they believe that.

The codes of conduct are unequivocal on talk radio.

Code 6.1 says you cannot broadcast material unless the person recorded knows about it.

You can’t put somebody to air unless they know they are on air.

That is under the headline ‘Interviews and talkback programs’. So is a prank call an interview?

It certainly wasn’t a talk back program.

They are covered by the light entertainment section, Code 9, and you could drive a truck through that.

So they may be OK under radio law however I think they have problems under surveillance and recording devices law.

Which says you can record another person when you are part of their conversation but not replay it without approval from them.

But look there is a broader point here. These two presenters. They should not wear it all.

The focus is all on the two DJ’s Mel Greig & Michael Christian.

That I suspect is wrong. Yes...they did do something stupid. But who takes responsibility?

Normal process is that these things are pre-recorded and replayed.

So who approved it going to air? These two are very junior presenters.

There is no way they would have made the decision to put it to air

Was it a senior producer? Was it a program director? Imagine if they pre-recorded this?

It was a world scoop – ‘the ultimate prank’. They would have been be so delighted. They would be running around telling everybody

So who knew? Who approved it? And why are these two wearing all the blame?

The buck stops with the boss.

LISTEN: CEO of Southern Cross Austereo Rhys Holleran speaks with Neil Mitchell

Having problems listening? Upgrade your media player for Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Firefox.

(Click here to listen to the audio in a pop-up window)


3AW Mornings with Neil Mitchell

Neil Mitchell Neil is one of Australia’s most experienced journalists with success in newspapers, radio and television. He was one of the youngest editors of a daily metropolitan newspaper, The Herald.


Blog comments Your Say

  • It was never funny, it was plain disrespectful to invade the royals privacy. It should never have gone to air without the permission of those involved. There should have been more 'royal security' to screen any calls. A lot of people are to blame here. Finally public pranks should never be allowed on innocent unsuspecting people, worse still someone you dont even know.

    margy Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 1:55 PM
  • I keep hearing Rhys Holleran claim that 2DayFM tried to call the Hospital five times prior to the 'prank' being aired! Am I such a sceptic? Do I believe this? Can these 'attempts' be proved? Time for Telsta or whoever to come out and prove this statement. Freedom Of Information? Somehow we must be able to validate Mr Hollaran's claim! ...Can we believe this radio CEO? Can I ask for confirmation of these attempts, please Mr Holloran...knowing how you have in the past claimed to be a bit baffled by community standards of 'decency' I am not sure that you and I have the same 'code of ethics' when it comes to telling the truth! Evidence of your attempts to contact, please Sir. As well, "trying' to get through (however many times!) does not constitute "getting through and receiving permission". Keep spinning, Rhys..we are not fooled!

    Roz2911 Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 12:27 PM
  • Rhys Holleran has been making excuses, avoiding truths, refusing to change the culture at 2day for far too long. This guy needs to go and the other management - has anyone asked Derek Bargwanna if he was involved - need to step up. I feel for these two presenters, they did what was expected of them, they worked in an environment that endorses exploitation, humiliation, bullying and so on.

    Rhys Holleran needs to man up and take it on the chin - he needs to go! And the other management involved need to be outed for their role. Spotlight should be on management who surely did not follow 'those processes.

    To say that this was unforseable is hardly accurate. You play with fire and eventually you or someone you are dealing with is going to get burnt.

    Kate Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 10:12 AM
  • CEO and the two morons should be fired and everyone ought to boycott the station AND any and all companies that advertise on it until that happens.

    Robert Carreira Tuesday 11 December, 2012 - 4:12 AM
  • Its so obvious that Mr Holleran has been speaking to his lawyers. Everything he said on radio has loaded with legal-speak "nobody could have foreseen the circumstances", "couldn't reasonably think it foreseeable". Tally the number of times he uses the words "reasonably foreseeable". Mr Holleran is more concerned about legal liability than anything else. puke!

    law guy Monday 10 December, 2012 - 10:48 PM
  • Absolutely agree the fault lies with the station bosses who OKd this and the hospital for not having any protocols in place to deal with calls re Kates' condition and care. Or even the royals themselves for not having a PR person to deal with these sort of calls, no matter who they claimed to be.

    GIW Monday 10 December, 2012 - 7:49 PM

Post a comment * Mandatory fields